| Honors Introduction to Philosophy | Richard Lee |
| Philosophy 2003 H 001, 002 | Spring 2008 |
[Be sure you are familiar with the format and ground rules for this exam.]
Questions will be referred to by their "names," listed to their left.
| "Name" | Question | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H-ANAL | Explain argument by analogy. Give an example of an argument by analogy other than one involving God, and show how the argument fits into the form of an analogy. What makes some arguments by analogy better or worse than others? Critically discuss. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| H-NATT | Explain what natural theology is and what positions the various characters in Hume's Dialogues take on the possibility of success in natural theology. Which position (one of theirs or some other) on natural theology seems most reasonable to you? Why? Critically discuss. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| H-LOOK | Explain the "Look round the world ..." argument concerning the existence and nature of God offered by Cleanthes in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| H-PH-O | Explain as clearly as you can and in some detail the various objections Philo raises to the main argument Cleanthes offered to prove for the existence of God and to establish what God is like. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| H-LIKE | Philo says that the principle Cleanthes appeals to in his primary argument in Hume's Dialogues is "Like effects prove like causes." Explain how this principle does (or does not) figure into Cleanthes' argument. Is it a good principle in general (quite apart from discussions about God)? Critically discuss. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| H-COP |
Cleanthes says "a caviller might raise all the same objections to the
Copernican system which you have urged against my reasonings." What are
Cleanthes reasonings which are in question? What objections did Philo raise against
those reasonings? Why does it seem to Cleanthes that the same objections could be
raised against the "Copernican system?" Explain Philo's response to this.
Critically discuss.
| H-IDE |
In Part IV of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Philo asks
Cleanthes "How, therefore, shall we satisfy ourselves concerning the cause of that
Being whom you suppose the Author of Nature, or ... the Ideal World into which you
trace the material?" What does Philo mean by "the Ideal World" here? What is the
problem that Philo is pointing out here with Cleanthes' position? What does Philo
propose as a solution? What is Cleanthes' reply? Is it adequate? Critically
discuss.
| H-ATTR |
Name several traits commonly attributed to God which Philo argues
(in Part V) cannot be established by the argument Cleanthes has offered to establish
the nature of God. Why does Philo think these cannot be established by
the argument? Critically discuss.
| H-ANI |
In Part VI of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Philo likens the
universe to an animal. Explain this analogy. On this analogy, according to
Philo, what role does a Deity play? What is Cleanthes' criticism of this analogy? What
kind of living thing, according to Cleanthes is the universe more like? Why?
Critically discuss.
| H-ETER |
Near the end of Part VI of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
Cleanthes argues that the world is not eternal. Explicate his argument. How does
Philo object to the argument? Critically discuss.
| H-NEW |
In Part VIII of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
Philo offers a "new hypothesis of cosmogony." Explain this hypothesis. What is the
hypothesis supposed to account for? Explain. What is Cleanthes' objection to the
hypothesis? Critically evaluate the hypothesis and Cleanthes' reply.
| H-APR |
In Part IX of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
Demea offers an argument for the existence of a Deity. Carefully explain Demea's
argument. Explain the objections Cleanthes raises to this argument. Critically
evaluate the argument and Cleanthes' reply.
| H-E-AR |
Carefully explicate the problem of evil as an argument to the conclusion
that God does not exist. Explain each premise in the argument and how the
flow of the argument (i.e. how the inferences go from the premises to the
subconclusions and the final conclusion).
| H-E-OB |
Explore possible objections to the argument against the existence
of God based on the logical problem of evil and explain how a defender of
that argument might reply to those objections. Critically discuss.
| H-E-RC | In
Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Demea suggests,
as a "solution" to the problem of evil, that "the present evil phenomena
... are rectified ... in some future period of existence?" Explain this
suggestion. On what grounds does Cleanthes reject it? Is Cleanthes right
to reject it? Why or why not? Critically discuss.
| B-ARGU |
Explain how Bentham argues with those who reject the principle of
utility as the principle for separating right from wrong actions.
Critically discuss.
| B-THEO |
Explain Bentham's view of what he calls the "theological principle" in
II.18. Critically discuss.
| B-DETER |
How, according to Bentham, are we ideally to determine whether some
action is right or wrong? What considerations are to be taken into
account? Is Bentham's method adequate? Why or why not?
| B-EG |
Bentham details how to determine the "general tendency of an act, by which the
interests of a community are affected." Explain this method and apply it to
an example. That is, explain how one could apply Bentham's method to
determine whether tell a lie, for instance.
| B-VALU |
Explain all the factors Jeremy Bentham delineates for considering the
value of a pleasure or pain. Give examples of pleasures and pains which
have and lack these features. Does his way of evaluating pleasures seem
adequate? Why or why not? Critically discuss.
| B-INT |
In Chapter VIII Bentham distinguishes various ways in which an act or a consequence
may be intentional or unintentional. Explain what Bentham means by "obliquely
intentional," "conjunctively inexclusively intentional," "disjunctively
inexclusively intentional," and "indiscriminately inexclusively intentional"
incidents. In each case give your own example. (In particular don't simply repeat
the king's death example with minor changes.)
| B-UNME |
Bentham indicates four situations in which punishment should not be inflicted.
Explain what each of these are, giving examples. Is he right that in each of these
cases there should not be punishment? Critically discuss.
| |