| Philosophy of Art | Richard Lee |
| Philosophy 4403 | Spring 2007 |
[Be sure you are familiar with the format and ground rules for this exam.]
Questions will be referred to by their "names," listed to their left.
| "Name" | Question | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-EMO | Acording to Bell art has something to do with emotion. What, according to Bell does art have to do with emotion? Explain. What does Bell argue that art does not essentially do in regard to emotion? Explain. Is Bell right about this? Why or why not? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| B-COM | Clive Bell asks "What quality is common to Sta. Sophia and the windows at Chartes, Mexican sculpture, a Persian bowl, Chinese carpets, Giotto's frescoes at Padua, and the masterpieces of Poussin, Piero della Francesca, and Cézanne?" What is his answer? Explain. Do all artworks have this quality? Defend your answer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| B-NAT | There are some works of "natural beauty" -- maybe a sunset, maybe the Grand Canyon, maybe the wings of a butterfly -- that seem every bit as beautiful as great artworks. But Bell claims these are not works of art. Why? Is Bell correct in this? Critically discuss. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| B-NOT | There are certain paintings which Clive Bell claims are not works of art. Give examples. Explain Bell's reasons for claiming these are not works of art. Is he right about these paintings? Why or why not? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| B-REP |
Plato thought art (at least the arts that he discussed) essentially involved
imitation, or what we might think of as representation. Explain Clive Bell's
position on the importance of representation to art. Critically discuss.
| SB-DIS |
Sibley distinguishes aesthetic and nonaesthetic properties. Give examples of each
and explain how he draws this distinction. Are there properties that are hard
to classify into these two groups? Explain. Critically discuss.
| SB-REL |
What relationship does Sibley see between aesthetic properties and nonaesthetic
properties? Explain. Is he right about this relationship? Critically discuss.
| SB-UGL |
Sibley in a footnote considers as an example a description such as "One eye red and
rheumy, the other missing, a wart-covered nose, a twisted mouth, a greenish pallor."
Why does this description present a problem for his view? Explain. How does Sibley
propose to solve the problem? Is his solution adequate? Critically discuss.
| SB-7CM |
Sibley proposes seven methods that an art critic might use to support an aesthetic
judgment. Explain these methods. Explain how each method fits (or fails to fit)
with Sibley's understanding of the relationship between aesthetic and nonaesthetic
properties. Critically discuss.
| B-FOG |
In order to illustrate his notion of "Psychical Distance" Bullough talks of a fog at
sea. Explain this example. Explain the notion of psychical distance which
Bullough appeals to. Does his analysis seem correct? Critically discuss.
| B-OTH |
In order to illustrate his notion of "Psychical Distance" Bullough talks people
watching a performance of Shakespeare's Othello. Explain this
example. Explain the notion of psychical distance which
Bullough appeals to. Does his analysis seem correct? Critically discuss.
| B-AGR |
Bullough claims that "“Distance ... provides the much needed criterion of the
beautiful as distinct from the merely agreeable.”" How does Bullough distinguish the
"agreeable" from the beautiful? How does the notion of "distance" fit into
this? Critically discuss.
| B-CRE |
Bullough offers a description of artistic creation, using an example from a
dramatist. What is this description? How does Bullough's account of "distance" fit
in here? Does this ring true? Critically discuss.
| DA-IT |
Danto talks about a theory he calls "IT." Explain this theory. He then talks about
a theory he calls "RT." Explain this theory. What is the difference between these
theories? Critically discuss.
| DA-IS |
Danto talks of the "'is' of artistic identification." What does he mean by that?
Give examples of its use. What, if anything, in Danto's view, does this "'is' of
artistic identification" have to do with whether something is a work of art.
Critically discuss.
| DA-NEW |
Explain Danto's "Newton's First Law" and "Newton's Third Law" example. What does
this show, according to Danto? Critically discuss.
| DA-BR |
Danto writes "the Brillo people cannot manufacture art and ... Warhol cannot
but make artworks." What does Warhol have to do with Brillo? Explain what
Danto means by this remark. Is it true? Why or why not? Critically discuss.
| DA-MX |
Danto suggests a matrix of style can be made by considering artistically relevant
predicates. Explain these predicates and the matrix he constructs. Explain the
following remarks of Danto in light of this: "Strictly speaking, a black square by
Reinhart is artistically as rich as Titan's Sacred and Profane Love. "Fashion
... favors certain rows of the style matrix." "An artistic breakthrough consists ...
in adding the possibility of a column to the matrix." (all from NR p.212)
| W-VIE |
Walton's "Categories of Art" begins by describing a view that Walton will be
attempting to refute. Explain this view. What does that view leave out that Walton
thinks is essential to criticism? Explain. Is the view right? Why or why not?
| W-SVC |
Kendall Walton distinguishes "standard," "variable," and
"contra-standard" properties with respect to perceptually distinguishable
categories. Explain. Give examples. Is this a useful way to divide up properties
of artworks? Why or why not? Critically discuss.
| W-RES |
Walton seems to think that there is a "paradox" in the fact that a picture might
resemble a person even though the picture is flat, for instance. How does he
propose to resolve this paradox? Is this a good resolution? Why or why not?
Critically discuss.
| W-GUE |
Walton imagines a category of artworks he calls "guernicas." Explain what these
are. What points does Walton make by appeal to his example of "guernicas?"
Explain. Walton's example was fictional. Can some of these points be made by
appeal to more "real-life" examples? If so, give such examples and explain the
points. If not, explain why not.
| W-ABS |
Walton defines a notion of properties which are standard, variable, and
contra-standard absolutely. Explain how he defines these terms. Why does he
introduce the notion "absolute" categories instead of simply talking of
"category-relative" interpretations? Critically discuss.
| W-COR |
Walton talks of several circumstances which count toward correctly perceiving a work
in a certain category. Explain these circumstances. Give examples.
| C-CRAF |
Collingwood distinguishes what he calls "art proper" from "craft." Explain what he
means by "craft." Give examples. What reasons does he give for saying that there
is a difference between art proper and craft. Critically discuss.
| C-TECH |
What does Collingwood mean by the "technical theory of art?" On that theory, what
is art? Give examples.
| C-SRT |
Explain the theory of art Collingwood calls the "Stimulus-Response Theory" or the
"Psychological Stimulus Theory." Collingwood distinguishes several varieties of
this theory. Explain what these are and what the differences between them are.
| C-EMO |
Acording to Collingwood "art has something to do with emotion." What, according to
Collingwood does art have to do with emotion? Explain. What does Collingwood argue
that art does not essentially do in regard to emotion? Explain. Is
Collingwood right about this? Why or why not?
| C-TRAG |
Collingwood writes "No artist ..., so far as he is an artist proper, can set out to
write a comedy, a tragedy, an elegy, or the like.”" Why does Collingwood think this?
Explain and critically discuss.
| C-IMA |
Collingwood says that a work of art is, or at least can be, an "imaginary" thing.
What does he mean by this? Why does he think this? Is he right? Critically
discuss.
| D-SING |
Stephen Davies divides up artworks into "singular" and "multiple" works of art.
Explain this distinction and give examples of each. Are there any artworks that
are hard to classify in this way? Explain. Could all artworks be understood as
"singular?" How? Could all artworks be understood as "multiple?" Explain.
Critically discuss.
| D-3MUL |
Davies considers three kinds of multiplicity in artworks. Carefully explain these
three ways that artworks, according to Davies, can be multiple. Give examples of
each. Are there multiple artwork that are hard to classify in this way? Explain.
Critically discuss.
| D-PERF |
Some works, apparently, are for performance and some are not. Explain how this
distinction lines up (or does not) with other distinctions Davies draws, e.g.,
between singular and multiple artworks and among kinds of multiple artworks. Give
examples. Are there works that are hard to classify in this way? Explain.
Critically discuss.
| D-UNI |
Some people think works are art are, or are like, "universals." Explain this view.
What are the problems with this view? How might they be solved? Critically
discuss.
| |