Soil Test Note No. F100

Dr. Stanley L. Chapman, Extension Soils Specialist and Dr. R. Larry Willett, Extension Forester

 

APPLYING FERTILIZER TO LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS

 

 

Recent research conducted in the Gulf Coastal Plain and the Ouachita Mountain regions of Arkansas showed significant volume growth responses to nitrogen or nitrogen plus phosphorus fertilizer by loblolly pines.

 

However, several factors need to be considered before one decides to fertilize.  The key points that follow are taken from the Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, General Technical Report SE-36:

 

When and Where to Apply Fertilizer

  1. If you are growing loblolly pine in plantations and you are looking for attractive investments in increased wood production, consider forest fertilization. 
  1. Planning for fertilization requires months of lead time to obtain soils information, to take foliage samples, and to have them analyzed.
  1. The only fertilizer elements currently known to produce economically attractive growth increases in loblolly pine are nitrogen and phosphorus.  Potassium, and perhaps other elements, limits growth on some sites, but further research is needed before applications can be recommended.
  1. Phosphorus fertilization is most likely to produce a response on very poorly to somewhat poorly drained clays and sands on the Lower Costal Plain where the stand that is being harvested has a site index (age 25) below 60 feet or where the existing stand is not vigorous.  Applying 50 pounds of phosphorus per acre has increased loblolly pine site index (age 25) by 10 to 15 feet on typical very poorly, poorly, or somewhat poorly drained soils on the Lower Costal Plain.
  1. Growth responses are not obtainable everywhere.  Foliar analysis is recommended for identifying sites to fertilize.  Even foliar analysis cannot give a perfect prediction of response, but it improves the probability of success.
  1. Results of foliar analysis are key indicators of needs for soil nutrients, and special procedures for collecting foliage samples must be followed.  If a regeneration cut is planned, foliage samples can be taken from the stand before harvest to determine the need for phosphorus application before a new stand is planted.
  1. A needle phosphorus content of less than 0.10 percent indicates a need for soil phosphorus.  The growth response to phosphorus fertilization increases as the needle phosphorus content without fertilization decreases from 0.10 to 0.06 percent.
  1. Where phosphorus deficiency has been identified, add 40 to 50 pounds of phosphorus per acre at the time of planting or as soon thereafter as practical.  The season of application is not important.
  1. Responses to nitrogen fertilization are best on soils where nutrient supplies are limiting growth but moisture conditions are favorable.  Highly responsive stands have basal areas of 70 to 120 square feet per acre and foliar nitrogen concentrations less than 1.2 percent.  The site index (age 25) should range between 50 and 75 feet.  If the needle phosphorus concentration is less than 0.12 percent, phosphorus should be applied along with nitrogen. 
  1. Where nitrogen is identified as deficient, apply 150 pounds of nitrogen per acre.  Where phosphorus is also deficient, apply 25 pounds of phosphorus per acre at the same time.  Treat 5 to 8 years before harvest to obtain the most attractive economic return from nitrogen.  In well-stocked (but not overstocked) stands, 5-year volume increment may be increased by 200 to 300 cubic feet per acre by this treatment.
  1. Moderately well to well-drained upland soils may show limited response to nitrogen fertilization because of insufficient moisture during the growing season. 
  1. Soils with a fragipan or shallow bedrock may also show little growth response from nitrogen fertilization because of limited rooting volume, in addition to moisture stress during part of the growing season. 
  1. Avoid burning for 6 months prior to application and for 4 years after application of nitrogen to avoid nitrogen fertilizer loss. 
  1. In selected stands, investments in forest fertilization can be expected to yield returns of 10 to 28 percent if increases in product value are taken into account. 

Probably the most important point to remember is that pine stands must be well-stocked (but not overstocked) before a response may be observed.  This means attention should first be directed toward adjusting the stand density to optimum levels before considering fertilization.  The potential for stagnated, overstocked natural stands to respond to fertilization is questionable.

 

More specific fertilization guidelines can be obtained from your local county Extension agent.  Forest managers considering large-scale fertilization are especially encouraged to obtain a copy of General Technical Report SE-36 by Wells and Allen.  Write to:  Publications, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, 200 Weaver Boulevard, P.O. Box 2680, Ashville, NC 28802.  Your local county Extension office may also be able to provide a photocopy of the report.

 

Acknowledgment:  Dr. H. Lee Allen, Director of the North Carolina State University, Forest Nutrition Cooperative (NCSFNC) provided much of the information for this article

 

References

 

Adams, M.B., R.G. Campbell, H.L. Allen, and C.B. Davey.  1987.  Root and foliar nutrient concentrations in loblolly pines:  Effect of season, site, and fertilization.  For. Sci. 33:984-996.

 

Allen, L.H.  1987.  Forest fertilizers:  Nutrient amendment, stand productivity, and environmental impact.  J. For. 85(2):37-46.

 

Gent, J.A., H.L. Allen, and R.G. Campbell.  1986.  Phosphorus and nitrogen plus phosphorus fertilization in loblolly pine stands at establishment.  South J. App. For. 10:114-117.

 

Gent, J.A., H.L. Allen, R.G. Campbell, and C.G. Wells.  1986.  Magnitude, duration, and economic analysis of loblolly pine growth response following bedding and phosphorus fertilization.  South J. App. For. 10:124-128.

 

Haines, L.W., and S.G. Haines.  1979.  Fertilization increases growth of loblolly pine and ground cover vegetation on a Cecil soil.  Forest Sci. 25:169-174.

 

Matziris, D.L, and B.J. Zobel.  1976.  Effect of fertilization on growth and quality characteristics of loblolly pine.  Forest Ecol. And Manag. 1:21-30.

 

McKee, W.H., Jr., and L.P. Wilhite.  1986.  Loblolly pine response to bedding and fertilization varies by drainage class on lower Atlantic Coastal Plain Sites.  South J. Appl. For. 10:16-21.

 

North Carolina State Forest Nutrition cooperative.  1988.  Two-year growth and one-year foliar responses of mid-rotation loblolly pine stands to N and P fertilization.  Report No. 21, College of Forest Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 81 pp.

 

Pritchett, W.L., and J. W. Gooding.  1975.  Fertilizer recommendations for pines in the Southeastern Coastal Plain of the United States.  Univ. of Florida, Agri. Exp. Sta. Bull. 774, 24 pp.

 

Vann, J.R.  1984.  Increase tree growth and income from forest fertilization. U.S.D.A., For. Serv. South For. Exp. Sta. Report R8-FR4, 11 pp.

 

Wells, C., and Lee Allen.  1985.  When and where to apply fertilizer:  A loblolly pine management guide.  U.S.D.A. For. Serv., Southeastern For. Exp. Sta., Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-36, 23 pp.

 

Wells, C.G., J.R. Craig, M.B. Kane, and H.L. Allen.  1986.  Foliar and soil tests for the prediction of phosphorus response in loblolly pine.  Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:1330-1335.

 

Wells, C.G., and D.M. Crutchfield.  1969.  Foliar analysis for predicting loblolly pine response to phosphorus fertilization on wet sites.  U.S.D.A. For. Serv., Southeastern for. Exp. Sta., Res. Note SE-128, 4 pp.

 

Wells, C.G., D.M. Crutchfield, N.M. Berenji, and C.B. Davey.  1973.  Soil and foliar guidelines for phosphorus fertilization of loblolly pines.  U.S.D.A. For. Serv., Southeastern For. Exp. Sta., Res. Pap. SE-110, 15 pp.

 

December, 1989

 

 

The Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service offers its programs to all eligible persons regardless of race, color, national origin, religion, gender, age, disability, marital or veteran status, or any other legally protected status, and is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

 

 

[Home]            [Table of Contents]