False Memory Reading Group

Fall 2004

 

Memory is a complicated thing, a relative to truth, but not its twin.  ~Barbara Kingsolver, Animal Dreams

 

 

i Brainerd, C. J., Holliday, R. E., & Reyna, V. F. (2004). Behavioral measurement of remembering phenomenologies: So simple a child can do it. Child Development, 75, 505-522.

i Clare, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Verbalizing facial memory: Criterion effects in verbal overshadowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 739-755.

i Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2004). True and false memory in the absence of perceptual identification. Memory, 12, 231-236.

i Dehon, H., & Bredart, S. (2004). False memories: Young and older adults think of semantic associates at the same rate, but young adults are more successful at source monitoring. Psychology & Aging, 19, 191-197.

i Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 120-128.

i Ghetti, S., & Alexander, K. W. (2004). “If it happened, I would remember it”: Strategic use of event memorability in the rejection of false autobiographical events. Child Development, 75, 542-561.

i Hege, A. C. G., & Dodson, C. S. (2004). Why distinctive information reduces false memories: Evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 787-795.

i Henkel, L. A. (2004). Erroneous memories arising from repeated attempts to remember. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 26-46.

i Hirshman, E. (2004). Ordinal process dissociation and the measurement of automatic and controlled processes. Psychological Review, 111, 553-560.

i Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda Rights: The power of innocence. Law & Human Behavior, 28, 211-221.

i Lindsay, D. S., Allen, B. P., & Chan, J. C. K. (2004). Eyewitness suggestibility and source similarity: Instrusions of details from one event into memory reports of another event. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 96-111.

i Pansky, A., & Koriat, A. (2004). The basic-level convergence effect in memory distortions. Psychological Science, 15, 52-59.

i Pryke, S., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Dysart, J. E. (2004). Multiple independent identification decisions: A method of calibrating eyewitness identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 73-84.

i Semmler, C., Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2004). Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 334-346.

i Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 756-777.

 


Important Legal Disclaimer: The preceding are articles we read together in the Lampinen Lab Fall 2004 false memory reading group. By clicking on the button next to the article you can see the summary of that article. The summary was prepared by the student presenting that article and it is of course the case that the views expressed in the summary do not necessarily represent the views of the reading group as a whole, Dr. Lampinen, the Lampinen Lab, Hugo's, the University of Arkansas, the Razorback Football or Basketball teams (although we're not sure about cross country), people living down the street from us, Bob Dylan, Jack Fate, our extended families, or anyone else for that matter except for the student who wrote the summary (and they don't necessarily believe what they wrote either). 

U of A

Psych Dept

Grad Program

Lab Homepage

Reading Group

Lab Publications

Lab Presentations