Terrance, C.A., Matheson, K., Allard, C. & Schnarr, J.A. (2000). The role of expectation and
memory-retrieval techniques in the constructions of beliefs about past events.Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 14, 361-377.

This article concerns the current controversy over delayed memories recovered in the therapy context.

Some therapists argue that traumatic memories can become dissociated and unavailable for conscious inspection and that the only way to uncover these memories is through special techniques like repeated suggestion.  They argue that these techniques are justifiable because hidden CSA can be substantiated through symptoms.

Critics argue that these techniques can lead to the creation of false memories.In their introduction Terrance et. al talk about a number of interesting studies showing that false childhood memories can be implanted:

These critics also argue that therapists expectations can lead them to suggest memories that are consistent with their expectations.  Particular techniques that have been criticized include: The present study examined whether false beliefs about the past can be created by using techniques that are similar to the social situation that that these authors believe exists in therapy and compared participants who varied in terms of hypnotizability.
Method
One hundred and seventy students took the Caleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale (CURSS) a measure of hypnotic suggestibility.

Participants took a bunch of personality tests that were "computer scored" and they were told that their result indicated that they were "High Receptive Cognitive Monitors" which they were told is common in people who were exposed to a "cold water treatment" shortly after birth.

There were four between subject conditions

Probed for memories of the day after birth.  Participants were to write down their memories, rate them in terms of clairity and difficulty in recall, and indicate whether they thought their reported experiences were memories or fantasies.

One the second day participants took part in group discussion with other participants.  They were told that by talking with others who had similar experiences that they may be able to remember more.  Went through two rounds of self reporting.  After the group session participants once again wrote down their memories of the day after birth.

Results
Participants in the three experimental conditions were more likely to report memories than subjects in the control condtion.  But the three experimental conditions did not significantly differ from each other.

Participants in the three experimental conditions were also more likely to specifically report a memory related to the "cold water" suggestion than were subjects in the control condition.  Furthermore, the imagery and hyponotic conditions resulted in more cold water memories than the expectancy condition.

Surprisingly, day after birth memories and water memories in particular were more common at time one than at time two or three. In addition, ratings of memory quality and belief in memory were greater at time one than at other times.Odd?

Discussion
Participants were willing to adopt the suggestion that they had had their hands immersed in cold water the day after birth and to report memories of this event.

All three of the memory retrieval techniques produced these effects, although as far as the specific water memory goes, the expectation condition produced fewer memories than the guided imagery or hypnosis condition.

Unexpectedly the repeated probing decreased false memories.  The authors suggest that this may be because the types of incentives for retrieval that exist in therapy were absent in the experiment.  Hmmmmmmmm?

High and medium hypnotizables were more likely to report false memories than were low hypnotizables.
 



 
University of Arkansas
Department of Psychology
Lampinen Lab
False Memory Reading Group
False Memory Reading Group Spring 2001