Waterman, A.H., Blades, M. & Spencer, C. (2000). Do children try to answer nonsensical questions? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 211-225.
 

- Children are often asked questions, and it’s generally important that they understand the nature of the question and give an appropriate answer.

 

- Previous research has shown children may misinterpret questions (Donaldson, 1978), slight wording changes can affect responses (Dale, Loftus, & Rathburn 1978), and that children may answer differently to the same question on separate occasions (Donaldson, 1978).

 

- Also it has been shown that children are susceptible to misleading questions, and can be confused by unfamiliar words (i.e. “lawyerese”)

 

- It has been found that children will try and answer “bizarre” questions (Hughes and Grieve, 1980)

 

- Research so far has focused on “yes/no” questions

 

- Predictions: Children will try to answer nonsensical questions but not scrambled questions.

 

Experiment 1:

 

- Three sensible closed (yes/no) and open questions, three nonsensible open and closed questions, two scrambled questions

 

- 73 kids, selected from three grades of a UK school.

 

- Explicitly explained that saying “I don’t know” or “I don’t understand” are ok answers.

 

- Three weeks later – same questions - sensible/silly judgement task – afterwards they were asked to explain judgement

 

Results:

- Results for task I in Table I

- Effects for age, question type, question format

- Interaction b/t question type and question format (figure 1)

- More correct responses to scrambled questions then to nonsensical closed questions

 

- Results for task II in table II

- 6 year olds did worse than 7 or 8 year olds

 

 

Discussion

Task I

- Nearly all children answered the sensible questions

- Majority tried to answer nonsensible questions closed questions

- Children rarely tried to answer nonsensible open questions

- They suggest that children may not try to answer all nonsensical questions, just the closed ones.

 

Task II

- Almost all children judged the sensible questions sensible, and nonsensical questions to be silly.

- It can’t be inferred that because children answered a nonsensical question they thought it was a sensible one.

 

Main Conclusion of Experiment I:

Children did not try to answer all nonsensical questions, mostly just the closed ones, and they did so despite realizing that the questions were silly.

 

 

Experiment 2:

- Experiment 1’s nonsensical closed questions all involved comparisons. So results may have come from format or nature of the questions.

 

- Three sensible closed questions, non-comparitive, and three sensible open questions, comparitive. Also three nonsensical closed non-comparitive questions and three nonsensical open comparitive questions that had been rated as “silly” used.

 

- Procedure identical to experiment I, except kids asked 24 questions

 

Results:

Task I

- Task I results in Table 3

- Effects for question type, question format, comparison.

- For sensible questions, open, non-comparison questions were answered better. But for closed questions, no difference. For nonsensical questions, no difference.

- Majority of children who did answer particular nonsensical question later judged these questions to be silly.

 

Task II

- Results in Table 4

- High proportion of correct responses for all types of question

 

Experiment II Discussion

- Children sometimes failed to give an answer to sensible open comparative questions. May have been difficult for them.

- Only ¼ of responses to nonsensical closed questions were appropriate

- No significant effect for the comparative nature of questions with nonsensical questions.

 

Main Experiment 2 Conclusion:

Reinforces notion that children try to answer nonsensical closed questions more than nonsensical open questions.

 

General Discussion

 

- Found children generally only answer closed nonsensical questions. Previous research may have overstated children’s tendency to answer ‘bizarre’ questions

 

- Hypothesize that high percentage of correct answers to open nonsensical questions to pre-test instructions of “I don’t know” answers, but then say that it is unlikely since the same effect was not observed on all questions.

 

- Children may not have monitored their comprehension of the questions enough. Closed questions only require a yes or no answer to be generated, but open questions are more complicated, and may need further comprehension monitoring.

 

- Interviewers should phrase questions in an open format and be sure the child knows that saying “I don’t know” is ok to reduce accuracy errors and ensure a child understands a particular question.



 
University of Arkansas
Department of Psychology
Lampinen Lab
False Memory Reading Group
False Memory Reading Group Spring 2001