Mutations
- Inheritance in Bacteria
- The Fluctuation Test of Luria and Delbruck
- the prevailing wisdom: bacterial inheritance was believed to be Lamarckian, and different from other organisms
- neo-Darwinian: mutations, desirable, undesirable, or neither, occur at random and the desirable ones are passed on to progeny.
- Lamarckian or directed-change: bacteria can adapt directly to the environment, and then pass the adaptation on to progeny.
- the Fluctuation Test disproved the directed-change hypothesis, and is generally considered to be the beginning of molecular biology
- Luria and Delbruck seized upon the different predictions of the two hypotheses: random-mutation hypothesis says that mutations appear prior to the addition of the selective agent, while the directed-change hypothesis says that mutants appear in response to the selective agent.
- They used phage T1 as the selective agent.
- T1 will kill wild-type E. coli, but mutations in the host receptor protein TonB make the host cell resistant to infection.
- If bacteria are spread on agar plate with phage T1, only the resistant mutants will form colonies, and the number of colonies is a measure of the number of mutations
- They performed two types of plating
- a single large culture grown overnight, and then divided into smaller aliquots and plated with T1
- 20 small cultures grown overnight, and then plated with T1
- Directed change mechanism would predict no significant difference in the results of the two experiments
- But, significant differences were obtained, including the tell-tale "jackpot" mutants found in the small cultures
- "fluctuations" in the numbers of resistant mutants in the small culture experiment provided compelling evidence in favor of random-mutation hypothesis.
- Lederberg's replica plating analysis provided further supporting evidence
- Types of Mutations
- endogenous or spontaneous mutations
- base substitutions can be transitions or transversions
- transitions involve the substitution of a purine for a purine (or a pyrimidine for a pyrimidine) on the same strand
- transversions involve the substitution of a purine for a pyrimidine (or vice versa) on the same strand
- types of base substitutions
- tautomeric shifts and mispairings
- deaminations
- of cytosine-uracil
- of 5 MeC -thymine
- hot spots
- depurinations can cause transversions
- happens when purine is removed during replication
- A is often incorporated in new DNA across from AP site
- this can lead to transversion in next round of replication
- oxidative damage
- can form 8 oxo dGuanine
- which pairs with A and can also cause transversions
- frameshifts and the Streisinger slippage model
- role of regions with base repeats
- slippage model
- phase variation in Bordetella pertussis
- bacterium causes whopping cough
- virulence genes are switched on and off as a group
- mechanism involves a frameshft hotspot
- spontaneous and programmed rearrangements
- direct repeats can cause deletions by looping out
- inverted repeats can cause inversions
- induced mutations
- base analogs behave as tautomers
- nitrous acid induces oxidative deaminations
- alkylating agents modify bases, particularly G-OMeG, which pairs with T
- hydroxylamine modifies C so that it pairs with A
- intercalating agents induce frameshifts
- Revertants and suppressors
- reversion is the restoration of a mutated function, through the reversal of the original mutation
- on the other hand, when one mutation relieves the effect of another mutation, we say that the original mutation has been "suppressed", and the second mutation is called a suppressor.
- intragenic (that is, in the same gene) suppressors are very useful, because they often indicate that two amino acids in a protein must interact for the protein to function properly.
- intergenic suppressors (that is, the suppressor mutation is in a different gene than the original mutation.
- second site suppressors
- might occur in one subunit to restore quaternary structure that was disrupted by the first mutation
- might have other effects that I'd rather not go into.
- nonsense suppressors are mutations, usually in tRNA genes, that cause the misreading of stop codons
- example: the tRNA for glutamine has the anticodon 3'GUC5'.
- there are two genes for this tRNA
- what if one of the tRNAGln genes is mutated such that the anticodon is 3'AUC5'. If it is charged normally with glutamine, it will incorporate a glutamine at the UAG stop codons during translation. We call the strain that carries this mutation a suppressor (specifically, an amber suppressor. Don't ask why. It doesn't help to know). Note: the other tRNA gene is normal, so normal glutamine codons can be read correctly by that charged tRNAGln
- thus, if another gene has a nonsense mutation that created a UAG stop codon, that mutation will be suppressed if it is placed in the amber suppressor.