Restriction/Modification
- The phenomenon with lambda and different E. coli strains
- efficiency of plating
- Luria's results with lambda
Bacterial strain |
|
E.O.P. |
|
|
lambda(K-12) |
lambda(B) |
lambda(C) |
K12 |
1 |
10-4 |
10-4 |
B |
10-4 |
1 |
10-4 |
C |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- Restriction/modification with K12 and B strains
- restriction is the phenomenon that leads to the low E.O.P.
- incoming viral DNA is "restricted" in the unfamiliar host strain
- like a type of immunity to viral infections
- modification is what happens to the few phage that escape restriction
- in other words, it is the reason that the E.O.P. is 10-4 and not zero
- the phage has been "modified" to survive in the new host strain
- this is not a mutation (e.g., an extended host range mutation), because the EOP keeps
flip-flopping back and forth with every change of host strain.
- Molecular basis of restriction/modification
- had to wait until the technology was available
- Arber 1965-68
- showed that foreign DNA is degraded to small pieces in the restriction processs
- an enzymatic process of the host
- hence the term "restriction endonuclease", which we use all the time today
- the modification that protects the foreign DNA is methylation
- Arber went on the characterize the hsd (host specificity determinant) of E. coli
- hsd is an example of a Type I restriction endonuclease
- consists of three subunit types with division of labor
- HsdR is the restriction enzyme, an endonuclease
- HsdM is the methylation subunit
- HsdS is the site recognition subunit (and the site is a specific sequence in the DNA)
- for EcoB1 it's TGA(N8)TGCT, with the A closest to the middle picking up the methyl group
- for comparision, the EcoK1 site is5' AAC(N6)GTGC
- the way is should work is that the state of incoming foreign DNA determines its fate
- fully methylated DNA is not cut by HsdR
- hemimethylated DNA is methylated, and not cut
- unmethylated DNA is chopped up
- actual site of endonuclease cleavage is far from the recognition site
- what's worse, it is not always the same site each time (that is, HsdR seems to choose at
random where it cuts)
- Unlike those that came after him, Arber was not able to capitalize on
restriction endonuclease properties
- Daniel Nathans and Hamilton Smith 1970
- colleagues at Johns Hopkins
- Ham Smith isolated HindII, the first characterization of a Type II restriction
endonuclease
- Nathans was at the same time perfecting gel electrophoresis of DNA fragments
- They determined the sequence of the HindII recognition (and cut, and modification) site
5' GTPyPuAC 3'
3' CAPuPyTG 5'
- enzyme cut right down the middle (at the two fold symmetry axis, notice?)
- methylation of "A"s preventing cutting
- more on Type II restriction endonucleases
- single subunit has the site recognition and cutting, and another subunit does the
methylating
- subunits can work independently
- this is, to quote Arthur Kornberg "one of nature's greatest gifts to
biochemists"
- it's actually gets even better, since many Type II enzymes leave cohesive ends.
More on that later.
- properties and notation, Type II
- named after organism
- 4 base, 6 base, 8 base cutters
- compatible enzymes have different recognition sites but leave the same ssDNA overhang
- EcoRI and ApoI
- BamHI and Sau3AI
- isoschizomers
- biological role of type IIs - ?
- Type III restriction endonucleases are often found on viral genomes,
eg., EcoPI
- more like type I than type II in cofactor requirements
- not useful
- Nathans used HindII to generate the first physical map (restriction
map) of DNA
- SV40 story, and a Nobel Prize, richly deserved, for Arber, Nathans,
and Smith
- restriction maps and how to make them
- Herb Boyer, EcoRI, and sticky ends
- EcoRI is a six base cutter isolated from E. coli, of course
- sequence and cut site is
5' G'AATTC
3' CTTAA'G
- notice that the single stranded overhangs are complementary
- this is true for all EcoRI sites, no matter the source of DNA
- Boyer, Cohen and Berg and the beginnings of recombinant DNA technology