There are
not many obvious reminders of the Vietnam War. Saigon is now officially called
Ho Chi Minh City, but the two names are used interchangeably. Vietnam is now a
communist country, but one is a lot more likely to see billboards exhorting one
to drink Tiger Beer than to work for the greater glory of the Fatherland.
Visiting Americans are greeted with smiles and welcomes rather than bullets and
grenades.
But every
once in awhile we saw a reminder of the painful past America and Vietnam have
shared. And nowhere was that more obvious than at the War Remnants Museum in Ho
Chi Minh City and the Cu Chi Tunnels.
The yard outside the War Remnants Museum is
filled with American tanks, bombs, armored vehicles, and weapons and western
tourists examining the displays. At first it all seems like any other museum.
We snapped pictures of the exhibits, until a smiling young woman who was
obviously not old enough to remember the war introduced herself as our tour
guide and we went into the first building, titled, “Historic Truths”.
The first thing we spotted
after walking in the door was a copy of Robert McNamara’s controversial book,
“In Retrospect” in which he said that America’s involvement in Vietnam had been
a mistake. Our guide pointed out the grim statistics, 7,850,000 tons of bombs
dropped, 75,000,000 liters of defoliants sprayed on crops, farms, forests, and
villages. Over 58,000 Americans were killed and nearly 3,000,000 Vietnamese
died. There were of course, the
requisite digs at the “imperialist aggressors”, but most of the information
sounded a lot like what I had read in Stanley Karnow’s “Vietnam: A History.”
But
then we went into the second building. The walls were covered with large black
and white photos, documenting American “atrocities” against the Vietnamese
people. Our tour guide solemnly pointed out pictures of peasants thrown from
helicopters, beheaded, dragged behind tanks. We saw bodies burned beyond
recognition and torn to shreds by bombs or mines. Some were so grainy that we
couldn’t be sure what was in the picture, others were sickeningly clear. Jean
Hershey, who had served as a nurse in Vietnam from 1971 to 1975 said that she
remembered taking care of patients who had been injured by fragmentation bombs.
Of course the famous picture of a South Vietnamese Army officer shooting a
prisoner at point blank range and the My Lai massacre were prominently
displayed.
There were
no corresponding pictures of any North Vietnamese actions, such as their mass
execution in Hue of “reactionary elements”, which Karnow said included civil
servants, army officers, intellectuals, clergymen, uncooperative merchants, and
anyone linked to the South Vietnamese.
Even those of us who remembered opposing the war were feeling very
uncomfortable. It was a graphic reminder the winners do indeed write history.
“There are two sides to every story,” Peggy reminded me, “and the truth is
usually in the middle.”
We went
through rooms illustrating the anti-war movement from all over the world, saw a
model of the infamous “Tiger Cages” on Con Dao island where the South
Vietnamese government crammed prisoners into these dark, tiny cells, and of the
guillotine which was used for executions until 1960. Jean said that she had
heard people talking about the tiger cages during her time in Vietnam.
There was,
however, one exhibit that presented a moving documentation of the horrors of
war from all viewpoints. “Requiem” is an exhibit actually sponsored by a number
of American organizations and featured the work of photographers, who were
killed in Vietnam. The photographers ran the gamut from Pulitzer Prize winners
to unknowns, the subjects wounded soldiers, refugees, fierce battles, suffering
families from all sides. We went through the exhibit in silence.
We emerged
from these grim exhibits into a courtyard full of souvenir shops selling
cigarette lighters and other paraphernalia decorated with the insignia of
American units that had served in Vietnam. But we were not in the mood for
shopping.
Later in
our trip we visited the Cu Chi Tunnels.
Cu Chi was a village just northeast of Saigon. In their book, “The
Tunnels of Cu Chi”, Tom Mangold and John Penycate said that Cu Chi became, Ôthe
most bombed, shelled, gassed, defoliated, and generally devastated area in the
history of warfare.” The tunnels began
during the war against the French and expanded under American bombardment to
include a system covering hundreds of kilometers, “stretched from the gates of
Saigon to the border with Cambodia.”
The tunnel complex included living quarters, storage areas, ordnance
depots, hospitals, even schools.
Peggy
Bullock, who had visited Cu Chi before, warned me that our visit would begin
with a propaganda film. And sure enough, the first thing we saw was a grainy
black and white film extolling the valiant efforts of the brave peasants of Cu
Chi who fought off the vicious American invaders. The rhetoric was certainly
overblown, but the facts were not that far off.
Then
we went outside and met our tour guides, this time young men, once again who
were all too young to remember the war, dressed in pseudo-army uniforms. We
followed the path into the woods past a bomb crater and to a pile of leaves
where we were asked to find the secret, emergency entrance to the tunnels. When
we found it, just a tiny opening, with a wooden cover, Nguyen Duong Dinh Thai
demonstrated how to go down. He got in, raised his arms, and slithered down out
of sight. Jean, the smallest of the Americans tried it next and made it. Then
John Benjamin, who’s a lot bigger, tried, and despite all our protests that
he’d get stuck, managed to get down and back. As we left the entrance, I heard
a loud bang. The tour guide told me that I had tripped a land mine.
We stopped
at an American tank that had been damaged by a land mine. We don’t know what
happened to the Americans who were in this tank, whether they were killed or
captured or got away. But now it’s a tourist attraction and we all piled on the
tank for a group picture, which our tour guides offered to take. We went to a
shooting range, where for $1, we could try our hand at firing some of the
weapons of the Vietnam War. I chose an M-16 and Apropos an AK-47. I missed.
Then we
went down into the tunnels. The tunnels we went into had been widened a bit for
the tourists, but that didn’t make them less claustrophobic for me. John
managed to get through just by bending down, but Apropos and I got down on our
hands and knees. Although lighting had been installed, the tunnels were dark
and hot. I tried to imagine what it would have been like during the war,
crawling through those tunnels, pursued by enemies, in danger of falling into a
variety of ingenious and deadly traps. I couldn’t even make it through the
entire 100 meters, and I crawled to the surface after the second exit, thinking
what a lousy guerilla fighter I would make.
Our guides
showed us how the tunnels were built so that the construction could not be
detected, how the smoke of cooking fires was routed far from the source, how
tiny air holes were disguised. They demonstrated “tiger traps” and other simple
but deadly weapons that could easily maim and kill any GI unfortunate enough to
become ensnared in them. We were filled
with horror but also admiration for the people who had devised this ingenious
system.
We left
the exhibits, sat down at a picnic table for a snack, and headed for the
souvenir stands. We were back in the Vietnam of 2002. We were all friends
again.
The
brochure from the War Remnants Museum lists the facts and figures of the war,
over 58,000 American dead, nearly 3 million Vietnamese killed and over 4
million injured. Perhaps its concluding statement is just another piece of
propaganda, but we should all hope it’s right, “human beings will not tolerate
such a disaster happening again, neither in Vietnam nor anywhere else on our
planet.”
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Index of
Vietnam Articles | Rural
Sociology at UA Home Page | D.
Voth’s Home Page