Gonsalves, B. & Paller, K.A.(2000). Neural events that underlie remembering something that never happened. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1316-1321.

The present study examined the neurophysiological correlates of true and false memories in a reality monitoring paradigm.

We know from studies using the DRM paradigm that true and false memories sometimes differ in terms of their experiential content.

Research in the neurosciences suggests that true and false memories also differ in terms of the brain regions that are active during recognition. In particular research in the DRM paradigm has found differences in activation in the prefrontal cortex between true and false memories.

In reality monitoring paradigms participants imagine some events and perceive other events. False memories occur when participants believe that they perceived events that they only imagined.

Prior research has shown that visual imagery can activate some of the same brain regions as visual perception. This may result in memory traces for imagined events that are a lot like the memory traces for perceived events and may result in false memories.
 

Methods

Results

Study Phase Results

Imagined items that later resulted in false memories were accompanied by greater parietal and occipital activation at study than imagined items that later resulted in correct rejections.

Pictures that were later correctly remembered produced greater overall activation at study than did pictures that were later incorrectly rejected.

Test Phase Results

True memories were associated with greater activation at posterior electrode sites than false memories.

In particular true memories and false memories differed in terms of their occipital activation and parietal activation with true memories tending to show a greater positive deflection.

Discussion

Gonsalves and Paller interpret the results as showing that true memories have greater perceptual detail than false memories.

Parietal activation may reflect activation of the Precuneus, an area that prior neuroimaging studies have found to be related to visual imagery. The activation of the Precuneus may occur because of reactivation of visual memory traces or the activation of a visual buffer.

It is also interesting that neural activity at encoding predicted false memories. Greater occipital activation at encoding resulted in more false memories.

These findings show that visual imagery at study can result in false memories, and the more detailed the visual imagery the greater the risk.


 
University of Arkansas
Department of Psychology
Graduate Program in Experimental Psychology
Lampinen Lab
False Memory Reading Group
False Memory Reading Group Summer 2001