Semantic Memory
Semantic / Episodic Distinction (Tulving, 1983)
Semantic Memory: Memory
for factual information (Centipedes have 100 legs)
Episodic Memory:
Memory for events (Remembering your first kiss)
Procedural Memory:
Memory for procedures (How to tie your shoe)
Propositional Networks
Proposition: Smallest
unit of meaning that can have a truth value. Propositions are not made
up of words in any language. Rather they are represented in a kind
of abstract metnal language. Propositions are made up of one predicate
and one or more arguments.
Arguments: Noun-like
things, or other propositions
Predicates: These
are things that say things (or predicate things) about arguments.
Attributes: Kind
of like adjectives. One place predicates.
Relations: Says
how two or more arguments are related. Multiple place predicates.
Propositional Network:
Groups of propositions that are connected together in complex ways in memory.
Many models of semantic memory propose that semantic memory is simply a
propositional network.
Argument Overlap:
One common view is that propositions are connected to each other in memory,
when they share arguments.
Quillan's Hierachical Network Model
Premises:
-
Semantic Memory is a propositional network
-
Arguments are represented as 'nodes" in this network
-
Relations are "links"
-
When verifying a statement like "John is in Arkansas" activation
spreads from the John node and from the Arkansas node until the two meet
up.
-
Strong Cognitive Economy:
Information is stored at the most general level possible and is not redundantly
stored.
Evidence for:
Lachman, Lachman & Butterfield (1979): Compare verification
time for statements that varied in terms of the number of links needed.
-
Canary can sing (1 link)
-
Canary has wings (2 links)
-
Canary can breathe (3 links)
`Collins & Quillian (1970): Subjects given back
to back questions. When questions answered from the same level of the network
speed of answering the second question is faster.
-
Different Levels: Are canaries yellow? Do canaries breathe?
SLOW RESPONSE TIME
-
Same Level: Do canaries eat? Do canaries breathe? FAST
RESPONSE TIME
Evidence against:
Rips, Shoben & Smith (1973): Compare verification
time for statements that did not vary in terms of number of links needed.
Found consistent differences in verification times.
Spreading Activation Model Collins
and Loftus (1973)
Model is like the Quillian model but tries to deal with
typicality effects. The length of each link is a function of the relatedness
of the concepts. The model also embraces weak cognitive economy meaning
that there can be some redundant information.
Feature Comparison Model (Rips,
Shoben & Smith, 1973)
According to the feature comparison model decisions such
as "Is a canary a bird?" are not based on activating a semantic network
but by looking at the features of the item and comparing them to the features
that characterize the category.
Two kinds of features:
Defining Features: All
members of the category have this feature
Characteristic Features:
Features that members of the category typically have
How a question like "Is a canary a bird?" is answered.
Step 1: Look at all the features (both defining and
characteristic). If canary has enough features of bird then say "YES" right
away. If canary has hardly any features of bird say "NO" right away. If
its somewhere in the middle, then go on to a second stage
Step 2: Look ONLY at the defining features. If it has
the defining features say "YES"
How this explains the results?
-
Canary has all the defining features of bird, plus it has
a lot of characteristic features. So when asked, "Is a canary a bird" people
say "YES" right away in step 1 and never have to go through step 2
-
Penguin has all the defining features of bird but not many
of its characteristic features. So when asked "Is a penguin a bird" in
step 1 they aren't sure. It doesn't have enough features to say "YES" right
away. It doesn't have so few features that they say "NO" right away. So
they go on to step 2 and look only at the defining features. Doing so convinces
them that penguins are birds, but it takes longer because people have to
go through two steps instead of only one.
ACT-R (Anderson, 1993)
-
Like the spreading activation model in many ways. Currently
the most precise and well worked out Propositional Network models of semantic
memory.
-
Speed of activation depends on how strong the link is compared
to other competing links. Each link is competing for the activation. This
can produce a Fan Effect. The more links the
longer it takes to verify any one proposition.
-
Anderson (1976): FAN EFFECT
A hippie is in the park
A hippie is in the church
A hippie is in the bank
A captain is in the park
A captain is in the church
A debutante is in the bank
Etc.
Did you see the following sentences?
A hippie is in the park? --Slow
A captain is in the park? --Fast
-
ACT also makes use of a production
system. A production system is simply a set of IF THEN rules that
are formally called productions.
These lecture notes were written
by Jim Lampinen at the University of Arkansas. Feel free to link
to them but please do not copy these notes in whole or in part for use
in your own course without my permission.