Click for Hunter S. Thompson
NAVIGATION

FRONT PAGE

NEWS

ENTERTAINMENT

EDITORIALS

SPORTS

ADVERTISE WITH US!

place your ad here!

OPINION



PRINT ARTICLE


Click to print!Click to print!



SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT
The CAMPUSVOICE needs writers, photographers, and graphic designers! inquire here: campusvoice@hotmail.com
Brent Warlow
guest commentary

Hungry, hungry Bush
by Brent Warlow
guest commentary

8 MAR 2001

The latest argument in Washington is centered on George Bush's campaign promise, now his proposal, on taxes. Depending on your party affiliation, the $1.6 trillion dollar plan can be viewed as either a well deserved and needed tax refund or an upscale, Monte Carlo version of "Hungry, Hungry Hippo," where the only players are the top income earners from the previous fiscal year.

Regardless of which side of the debate you take, these are familiar battle lines, as we've all been through other Republican attempts, some successful, others just funny, to sling mud out of the trough they work so hard to be in charge of.

Now, at this point it would be very easy to make pig-type politician jokes, but I prefer to keep such things to a minimum. Though, I must confess, nothing would please me more than to watch our Republican-led Congress writhe around and squeal until it's time for the slaughterhouse that is our electoral process to grind the whole mess to a halt.

There is one refrain in particular that pokes (last time, I promise) at the collective intelligence of the American people, or at least those that have enough money to own some means of obtaining news, but not enough money to have made the voyage to Monte Carlo, only to find that they've never heard of "Hungry, Hungry Hippo."

The refrain that I'm referring to goes something like this: The people that pay the most in taxes should get the most from a tax break, not simply due to some undefined belief in the God of fiscal symmetry, but because (they say) that to do otherwise would be a punishment of success.

But what does "success" mean if all the barriers are removed from its realization? Does it mean that any unlucky person who inherits enough money to have to pay taxes at the highest rate qualifies as a "success"?

By this standard, we can all be successful. All it requires is being born into the right circumstances. Either the idea of success is so vacuous as to be meaningless or Bush's grasp of economics is worse than his driving record.

It is readily apparent what kind of success will be rewarded if Bush's tax proposal succeeds. Let's just hope that legislative success proves to be more elusive than the kind of success Bush understands.


[TOP OF PAGE]


front page | help the CV | advertise
contact | www.uark.edu | UARK Webmail

Copyright ©2001 CAMPUSVOICE at the University of Arkansas. All rights reserved.
email us @ campusvoice@hotmail.com