Click for Hunter S. Thompson
NAVIGATION

FRONT PAGE

NEWS

ENTERTAINMENT

EDITORIALS

SPORTS

ADVERTISE WITH US!
place your ad here
NATIONAL NEWS



PRINT ARTICLE


Click to print!Click to print!


A convicted murder or a rapist would have no problem receiving federal financial aid if the person qualified financially as long as they have no drug convictions.

CAMPUS VOICES

Q: Should students who are convicted of drug possession be banned from receiveing financial aid?

And the voices say...

'There are much worse crimes out there than illicit drug use."
–Jackson Muray, freshman


"I don't think it's right that people should be denied loans to go to school because they happen to smoke pot. Drugs have nothing to do with higher education.
–Chris Womack, sophomore


"If the condition is that I can't do drugs and I know that, then I should abide by that rule. I see no problem with it.
– Roger Orobi, grad student


"I believe that stopping students from getting financial aid after they have been convicted stops them from bettering their life and improving their state in society."
–Jonathan Rogers, junior


"I can't understand why someone should be penalized twice. You're prohibiting someone from succeeding if you hold them back for one mistake they've made."
–Alicia Bishop, junior


SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT
The CAMPUSVOICE needs writers, photographers, and graphic designers! inquire here: campusvoice@hotmail.com
Amanda Henry
staff writer

Student group questions financial aid drug laws
by Amanda Henry
staff writer

8 MAR 2001

Any student who has ever filled out a Free Application for Federal Student Aid knows the forms require a lot of personal information. But did anyone notice question 35, which asks, "Have you ever been convicted of selling or possessing drugs (not including alcohol or tobacco)?"

If the question is answered with a 'yes,' then the applicant can be denied any form of federal financial aid that may come as a result of the application process. This denial is allowed in the 1998 Higher Education Act.

The drug-free provision of the HEA states that for a first offense conviction of possession of a controlled substance the student must go through an "ineligibility period" of one year, but the period is two years for sale of a controlled substance. For the second offense, the student faces an ineligibility period of two years, and for the third offense the student is indefinitely ineligible for any form of federal financial aid. The only way a student can override the conviction is by satisfactorily completing a drug rehabilitation program.

No other questions regarding any other type of offense is on the FAFSA. A convicted murder or a rapist would have no problem receiving federal financial aid if the person qualified financially as long as they have no drug convictions.

This provision of the HEA only affects young drug offenders. They are denied an opportunity that could help them the most, a valuable education.

This type of selectivity has a discriminatory affect on low-income families who would not be able to afford college without federal financial aid. Wealthy kids who have drug convictions need not worry about the provision. They can afford to pay for their education without federal financial assistance.

Not only does it discriminate against low-income families, but it also discriminates against minorities.

According to the Sentencing Project, an independent source of criminal justice policy analysis, African Americans comprise approximately 13 percent of the population and 13 percent of all drug users, but shockingly account for more than 55 percent of those convicted of drug offenses.

One group who adamantly opposes the drug-free provision of the HEA is Students for Sensible Drug Policy.

The college organization has over seventy chapters on campuses across the U.S. Its mission statement reads: " Students for Sensible Drug Policy is committed to providing education on harms caused by the War on Drugs, working to involve youth in the political process, and promoting an open, honest and rational discussion of alternative solutions to our nation's drug problems."

The SSDP encourages students to lobby members of Congress to support House Resolution 1053, which would repeal the drug-free provision of the HEA. Also on the SSDP agenda is educating the public and informing the members of Congress about the ramifications of the drug-free provision. For more information on the SSDP visit their website at www.ssdp.org

[TOP OF PAGE]


front page | help the CV | advertise
contact | www.uark.edu | UARK Webmail

Copyright ©2001 CAMPUSVOICE at the University of Arkansas. All rights reserved.
email us @ campusvoice@hotmail.com