Coody v. Northwest Arkansas Times


MEDIA LAW (JOUR 3633)
Back to Law Schedule

OUTLINE OF Coody v. Northwest Arkansas Times

 I Who is the plaintiff? By name and legally.

II Who are the defendants?

III Facts of the case

Mayoral race

Rumors about Coody, acknowledged and evidence submitted to media

NWAT hires investigator

Editorial "Facade" on Saturday before election

Article "Probe" on Election Day (acknowledged hiring investigator and mentioning confidential source)

IV Elements of Libel

Where is defamatory language? Libel per quod ("libel by innuendo")

Was there actual malice? (consider Stokes' motivation)

Falsity?

V Defenses

Substantial truth

Opinion

Privilege

VI Jury Trial

Defendants found liable, Coody awarded judgment of $275,000

VII State Supreme Court Appeal

Arkansas Supreme Court overturns verdict, found no actual malice

Did not have to reach questions of defamatory language and falsity

VIII Petition for Certiorari

Denied

IX Precedent


Back to Law Schedule