Click for Hunter S. Thompson
NAVIGATION

FRONT PAGE

NEWS

ENTERTAINMENT

EDITORIALS

SPORTS

ADVERTISE WITH US!
place your ad here
NATIONAL NEWS



PRINT ARTICLE


Click to print!Click to print!


It seems Microsoft fears that open source and free software could destroy much of their profits.



SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT
The CAMPUSVOICE needs writers, photographers, and graphic designers! inquire here: campusvoice@hotmail.com
Daniel Vaught
staff writer

Microsoft challenges open-source software
by Daniel Vaught
staff writer

8 MAR 2001

Approximately two weeks ago, Jim Allchin, head of operating-system development for software giant Microsoft, publicly announced Microsoft's views of the GNU project's General Public License (GPL). Allchin has stated that the group's open source programming model is against "the American way" and the concept is "a destroyer of intellectual property rights."


(Graphic by Jonathan Ward)

GNU (a recursive acronym for "GNU's Not Unix") is a group that was formed in 1984 to develop a quality, free operating system. In the GNU's GPL philosophy, the word "free" means both monetarily free as well as the freedom implied by their distribution models and goals. According to their manifesto, the group sees themselves developing software to "encourage the spirit of voluntary cooperation in its citizen's" as well as to "better humanity."

The outcome of these lofty goals has been the Linux operating system. Linux has become incredibly popular as a platform for Internet servers, end user computers, and developer platforms.

Linux and its derivatives easily rival Microsoft for server platforms on the Internet, as well as stand-alone networks around the world. This brings us back to the issue at hand: Microsoft's take on the issue.

It seems Microsoft fears that open source and free software could destroy much of their profits. There is some indication that Microsoft may be lobbying the Bush administration very hard to take a look at the GPL for legality issues. Microsoft, long known for its lack of innovation, would love to be able to use ideas and code protected under the GPL.

The GPL currently allows for only the free distribution of the software, including the source code. As an individual, or even as a business, a person is allowed to modify, improve, add to and even distribute the program code as long as the source code is publicly provided to other members of the project and the whole world.

If the government was to suspend the legality of open-source development, Microsoft could then use software that has had years of development, a strong user base, and a huge support network, slap their logo on it and make millions on it.

Rumors have been circling the Internet about Microsoft lobbying doubly hard recently with the Bush administration on the issue. It appears they are lobbying for the removal of funds from public universities who are now developing under the GPL.

They also want to heavily incorporate some ideas into their next generation proprietary software; something rumors say the Bush administration might not be against. This means they could sell something that people around the world developed for free for the betterment of society.

To counter Microsoft, GNU project founder Richard Stallman has repeatedly said his inspiration came from the ideals of the American revolution: Freedom, community and voluntary cooperation. With Microsoft's recent statements, it appears these are ideas they are against.

[TOP OF PAGE]


front page | help the CV | advertise
contact | www.uark.edu | UARK Webmail

Copyright ©2001 CAMPUSVOICE at the University of Arkansas. All rights reserved.
email us @ campusvoice@hotmail.com